Home | Sign Up | Log In | RSSTuesday, 2018-12-11, 0:23 AM


Site menu
Section categories
Education [150]
Videos [1]
Music [0]
Chat Box
learn c language learn c language branching and loop learn c language functions learn c language Pointer Basics how web page works Oracle Solaris 10 Oracle Solaris 10 How Web Pages Work Images How Web Pages Work Adding images&gr How Web Pages Work Introduction to How to Install WAMP How to Host Your Own Website for Fr How to Install the Apache Web Serve Atomic Structure The text provides 000 tons of conversations Introduction to How Radio Works Rad often over millions of miles citizens band radio Introduction to How the Radio Spect Can information travel faster than How F-15s Work by Tom Harris Browse How F/A-18s Work by Robert Valdes B How F/A-18s Work by Robert Valdes B Flying Video Game: In the Cockpit I How F/A-22 Raptors Work by Gary Wol 10 Unidentified Sounds That Scienti 10 Things You Didn't Know About Ein Is glass really a liquid? by Laurie How Radio Works by Marshall Brain B How Radio Works by Marshall Brain B 10 Most Terrifying Vehicle Manufact How a Top Fuel Dragster Works by Ch but can Siri meet our nee How Siri Works by Bernadette Johnso How the Tesla Turbine Works by Will Lecture 1: Inflationary Cosmology: Lecture 2: Inflationary Cosmology: Lecture 4: The Kinematics of the Ho Lecture 5: Cosmological Redshift an Lecture 6: The Dynamics of Homogene Lecture 7: The Dynamics of Homogene Lecture 8: The Dynamics of Homogene Lecture 9: The Dynamics of Homogene Lecture 10: Introduction to Non-Euc IBPS Clerical Cadre Exam Pattern De Institute of Banking Personnel Sele Educational Qualifications: A Degre INTERVIEW Candidates who have been official trailer for Mission Imposs How Relativity Connects Electric an in 1738 Kinetic Theory of Gases: A Brief Re Frames of Reference and Newton’s La attempts to measure the UVa Physics 12/1/07 “Moving Clocks Run Slow” pl More Relativity: The Train and the 12/1/07 The Formula If I walk from Adding Velocities: A Walk on the Tr 3/1/2008 The Story So Far: A Brief Mass and Energy Michael Fowler Energy and Momentum in Lorentz Tran How Relativity Connects Electric an Analyzing Waves on a String Michael by f even earlier than the bra Fermat's Principle of Least Time 9/ Hamilton's Principle and Noether's meaning they have Mechanical Similarity and the Viria Hamilton's Equations 9/10/15 A Dyna A New Way to Write the Action Integ Maupertuis came up with a kind of p Maupertuis' Principle: Minimum Acti Canonical Transformations Point Tra Introduction to Liouville's Theorem Adiabatic Invariants and Action-Ang Hyperbolas Michael Fowler Prelimina Mathematics for Orbits: Ellipses Keplerian Orbits Michael Fowler Pre Newton's equations for particle mot Dynamics of Motion in a Central Pot A Vectorial Approach: Hamilton's Eq Elastic Scattering Michael Fowler B Driven Oscillator Michael Fowler (c Dynamics of a One-Dimensional Cryst I usefor the spring constant (is a a mass on a spring Motion in a Rapidly Oscillating Fie Anharmonic Oscillators Michael Fowl in which the distance betw Motion of a Rigid Body: the Inertia Moments of Inertia: Examples Michae Euler's Angles Michael Fowler Intro or more precisely one our analysis of rotational motion h Euler's Equations Michael Fowler In Motion in a Non-inertial Frame of R Ball Rolling on Tilted Turntable Mi live cricket score roll the ball ba

Total online: 1
Guests: 1
Users: 0
Home » 2017 » September » 1 » A Vectorial Approach: Hamilton's Equation and the Runge Lenz Vector
1:32 AM
A Vectorial Approach: Hamilton's Equation and the Runge Lenz Vector

A Vectorial Approach: Hamilton's Equation and the Runge Lenz Vector

(Mainly following Milne, Vectorial Mechanics, p 235 on.)

Laplace and Hamilton developed a rather different approach to this inverse-square orbit problem, best expressed vectorially, and made a surprising discovery: even though conservation of angular momentum and of energy were enough to determine the motion completely, for the special case of an inverse-square central force, something else was conserved. So the system has another symmetry!

Hamilton's approach (actually vectorized by Gibbs) was to apply the operator http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image067.pngto the equation of motion http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image019.png:






This is known as Hamilton's equation. In fact, it's pretty easy to understand on looking it over: http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image071.pnghas magnitude http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image072.pngand direction perpendicular to http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image073.pnghttp://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image019.png, http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image074.png, etc.

It isn't very useful, though -- except in one case, the inverse-square:http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image075.png (so http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image076.png)

Then it becomes tractable:


and -- surprise -- this integrates immediately to


wherehttp://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image079.pngis a vector constant of integration, that is to say we find


is constant throughout the motion!

This is unexpected: we found the usual conserved quantities, energy and angular momentum, and indeed they were sufficient for us to find the orbit. But for the special case of the inverse-square law, something else is conserved. It's called the Runge Lenz vector (sometimes Laplace Runge Lenz, and in fact Runge and Lenz don't really deserve the fame -- they just rehashed Gibbs' work in a textbook).

From our earlier discussion, this conserved vector must correspond to a symmetry. Finding the orbit gives some insight into what's special about the inverse-square law.

Deriving the Orbital Equation from the Runge-Lenz Vector

The Runge Lenz vector gives a very quick derivation of the elliptic orbit, without Bernoulli's unobvious tricks in the standard derivation presented above.

First, taking the dot product of http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image080.pngwith the angular momentum http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image028.png, we find http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image081.png, meaning that the constant vectorhttp://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image079.png lies in the plane of the orbit.

Next take the dot product of http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image079.pngwith http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image082.png, and since http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image083.png, we find http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image084.png, or


where http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image086.pngand http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image043.pngis the angle between the planet's orbital position and the Runge Lenz vector http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image079.png.

This is the standard http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image010.pngequation for an ellipse, with http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image087.pngthe semi-latus rectum (the perpendicular distance from a focus to the ellipse), e the eccentricity.

Evidently http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image079.pngpoints along the major axis.

The point is that the direction of the major axis remains the same: the elliptical orbit repeats indefinitely. If the force law is changed slightly from inverse-square, the orbit precesses: the whole elliptical orbit rotates around the central focus, the Runge Lenz vector is no longer a conserved quantity. Strictly speaking, of course, the orbit isn't quite elliptical even for once around in this case. The most famous example, historically, was an extended analysis of the precession of Mercury's orbit, most of which precession arises from gravitational pulls from other planets, but when all this was taken into account, there was left over precession that led to a lengthy search for a planet closer to the Sun (it didn't exist), but the discrepancy was finally, and precisely, accounted for by Einstein's theory of general relativity.

Variation of the Momentum Vector in the Orbit (Hodograph)

It's interesting and instructive to track how the momentum vector changes as time progresses, this is easy from the Runge Lenz equation. (Hamilton did this.)

From http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image088.png, we have


That is,


Staring at this expression, we see that

http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image091.pnggoes in a circle of radius http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image092.pngabout a point distancehttp://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image093.pngfrom the momentum plane origin.

Of course, http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image091.pngis not moving in this circle at a uniform rate (except for a planet in a circular orbit), its angular progression around its circle matches the angular progression of the planet in its elliptical orbit (because its location on the circle is always perpendicular to thehttp://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image094.pngdirection from the circle center).

An orbit plotted in momentum space is called a hodograph.

Orbital Energy as a Function of Orbital Parameters Using Runge-Lenz

We'll prove that the total energy, and the time for a complete orbit, only depend on the length of the major axis of the ellipse. So a circular orbit and a very thin one going out to twice the circular radius take the same time, and have the same total energy per unit mass.

Takehttp://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image095.png and square both sides, giving


Dividing both sides by http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image097.png,


Putting in the values found above, http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image099.pngwe find


So the total energy, kinetic plus potential, depends only on the length of the major axis of the ellipse.

Now for the time in orbit: we've shown area is swept out at a rate http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image101.png, so one orbit takes time http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image102.png, and http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image103.png, so


This is Kepler's famous Third Law: http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/7010/CM_15_files/image105.png, easily proved for circular orbits, not so easy for ellipses.

Important Hint!

Always remember that for Kepler problems with a given massive Sun, both the time in orbit and the total orbital energy/unit mass only depend on the length of the major axis, they are independent of the length of the minor axis. This can be very useful in solving problems.

The Runge-Lenz Vector in Quantum Mechanics

This is fully discussed in advanced quantum mechanics texts, we just want to mention that, just as spherical symmetry ensures that the total angular momentum and its components commute with the Hamiltonian, and as a consequence there are degenerate energy levels connected by the raising operator, an analogous operator can be constructed for the Runge-Lenz vector, connecting states having the same energy. Furthermore, this raising operator, although it commutes with the Hamiltonian, does not commute with the total angular momentum, meaning that states with different total angular momentum can have the same energy. This is the degeneracy in the hydrogen atom energy levels that led to the simple Bohr atom correctly predicting all the energy levels (apart from fine structure, etc.). It's also worth mentioning that these two vectors, angular momentum and Runge-Lenz, both sets of rotation operators in three dimensional spaces, combine to give a complete set of operators in a four dimensional space, and the inverse-square problem can be formulated as the mechanics of a free particle on the surface of a sphere in four-dimensional space.


Category: Education | Views: 248 | Added by: farrel | Tags: p 235 on.) Laplace and Hamilton dev, Vectorial Mechanics, A Vectorial Approach: Hamilton's Eq | Rating: 0.0/0
Total comments: 0
Name *:
Email *:
Code *:
Log In
Entries archive

Copyright eduCampus.tk © 2018
Powered by uCoz